Next time you eat a french fry, think about where the potato came from. Most of us are completely dependent on commercial
horticulture to supply us with seeds, plants, produce, flowers,
herbs, and all the products that are derived from them. We
expect high-quality products at an affordable price. So what do
you think are the biggest challenges to commercial horticulture
and what can be done about them? Two of the greatest concerns
are the access to good quality natural resources: water and soil.
Other problems are the potential for catastrophic crop loss due
to disease or bioterrorism, and international competition that
drives down prices and makes it increasingly difficult for commercial
farms to make a profit.
Well water is preferred for irrigation because it is usually of
a higher quality than surface water from ponds, lakes, or rivers,
which can contain pathogens. Excessive use of groundwater
through heavy irrigation causes
geologic problems, such as those
seen in California, Texas, Arizona, and some of the states surrounding
the Gulf of Mexico. One of the best examples is seen
in the experience of Mexico City. The water is withdrawn by
wells from aquifers at a rate that is faster than the recharge of the
aquifers by
precipitation and
percolation; if the
soil pores that were
once filled with water collapse, the aquifer cannot be recharged,
the wells run dry, and the land sinks.
The rate of water withdrawal from the Colorado River and
the current drought, combined with population growth in the
sunny, warm regions of the Southwest, further endangers freshwater
supplies and wreaks havoc on the environment. Commercial
horticulture tends to follow the sun because warmer climates
mean longer growing seasons, but there simply is not enough
water to go around and the poor Colorado River is drained dry
before it ever reaches the ocean. Additionally, heavy irrigation of
soil in semiarid and arid regions creates problems with salination
and poor soil fertility similar to those that caused the downfall
of ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Greek, and Roman agricultural
productivity.
 |
Figure 6.1 Technicians inspect Russet potatoes,
the potato of choicefor french fry processors. |
As urban sprawl encroaches on agricultural land, there are
conflicts. The well-drained loamy soils that are perfect for growing
crops are also ideal for building houses, and it is very tempting
for a farmer who is barely getting by to sell the land to the
highest bidder. When residential neighborhoods come into
contact with farmland, there are concerns with dangers associated
with pesticide drift and drinking water contamination.
Across the United States, prime farmland is being turned into
housing developments. Increased pressure for biofuels (such as
ethanol, which is made from corn) may translate into even more
land taken away from food production, with a corresponding
increase in the amount of chemical fertilizers and herbicides
applied.
The frozen-food industry often contracts with farmers to
grow specific cultivars because the plants yield fruits or vegetables
of a consistent size and quality that can be readily processed
by their manufacturing equipment. One example is the
Russet potato, the cultivar bred by Luther Burbank, which is
the perfect size and has the best consistency for making french
fries (Figure 6.1). The problem is that this potato cultivar is also
prone to disease. Heavy applications of pesticides are required
to produce a crop acceptable to factory owners. This is not in
the best interests of the farmer, because land abused with heavy
applications of chemical fertilizers and pesticides becomes less
fertile over time and can endanger the health of the farmer.
Other types of potatoes are disease resistant and do not require
the pesticide use, but the factory wants the Russets so the farmer
either produces them or loses the contract. Factory farms are
one reason that farmers practice monocropping.
A problem with monocropping is the reduction in the genetic
diversity of our food crops. High diversity means that a crop
has many different varieties. Some of these may have traits for
resistance to a particular disease. The lower the diversity of our
food crops, the more susceptible they are to outbreaks of natural
diseases or bioterrorism. Low crop diversity has led to catastrophic
failure as a result of disease, because all the plants are
susceptible to the same pathogens. The corn blight of 1970 wiped
out most of the nation’s corn crop because growers all planted
the same variety, which could not resist this microbial infection.
Seed gene banks store genetic diversity for breeding new hybrids
of important food crops, but unless diverse crops are planted in
the field, a single disease can wipe out entire harvests.
 |
Figure 6.2 Traditional greenhouse production of
plants involves overhead irrigation as opposed to
the method described in the text for hydroponics.
Greenhouses allow for a controlled environment
unsusceptible to harsh weather conditions, but
plants are still
prone to insect infestations and
microbial diseases and must be carefully
monitored.
|
All of this sounds quite dreadful, but many commercial growers
are implementing sustainable methods to overcome these
problems and legislatures across the country are taking steps to
conserve farmland and good freshwater. There is a long way to
go. Consumer demand for organically grown produce helps to
put pressure on the food processing industry, which in turn may
help farmers who want to plant more diverse crops and reduce
pesticide use.